On the importance of historical context

swine


6 Responses to “On the importance of historical context”

  1. Meagan said:

    Apr 28, 09 at 11:46 am

    “Nope… Bacon not done yet.”

  2. the branwich horror said:

    Apr 28, 09 at 1:04 pm

    Now we get to play the immunity game! Who’s immune, who’s not?

    Besides the point that this is getting blown out of proportion. Chicken pox used to be lethal, way back in the day, and we got that from an animal. Small pox, measles, rubella. We’ll contain it. (so long as the Republican forces stop standing in the way of appointees for public health positions.) Hey, surely Britain has some kind of… no? Ok. Well, maybe there’s always Australia…

  3. sue said:

    Apr 28, 09 at 8:07 pm

    They both look happy.

  4. Meagan said:

    Apr 30, 09 at 11:14 am

    The coming aporkalypse makes me think it may perhaps be time to break out the word “apocaplectic” again. As in, “People are getting all apocaplectic about the swine flu.”

    And all those other apoca-words too, ’cause they rock.

  5. cynical ju said:

    May 01, 09 at 2:08 pm

    So *that’s* how H1N1 gets passed along ….

  6. marramgrass » Blog Archive » Irregular Linkdump, #18 said:

    May 13, 09 at 12:37 am

    [...] highlights the importance of historical context. [...]



Leave a Reply