Comments on: Takes one to know one http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418 We of course all understand it, being intellectuals. Thu, 05 Jun 2025 17:47:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0 By: miguel http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8625 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:20:48 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8625 PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!

]]> By: ann http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8624 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:51:29 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8624 Would it ruin your carefully garnered reputation if I said I found you neither lech nor perv? :)

]]> By: miguel http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8623 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:17:16 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8623 ok, perv = good, lech = bad.

eeksy, you’re right, it’s the preview thing’s fault. I don’t know how to fix it, though.

also, my Site Meter counter has been acting up lately, but only at this site – the ones for the Shoe Project and Raising Hell both seem to be working fine…

]]> By: Jessica http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8622 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:13:42 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8622 A lech makes me retch, but a perv makes me swerve…
Oh, Solonor so totally wins.
I think that’s gonna be my new email sig.

]]> By: Eeksy-Peeksy http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8621 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:39:13 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8621 Also, lech implies (to me, anyway) a guy older than the target of his lechery. The proverbial dirty old man.

And then there’s Lech Walesa.

]]> By: Eeksy-Peeksy http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8620 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:36:44 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8620 It worked!

Maybe it’s the preview (not perview) that fails?

]]> By: Eeksy-Peeksy http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8619 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:35:57 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8619 A lech is a lecher: “Man with strong sexual desires” in my dictionary.

A perv is a pervert: “A person whose behavior deviates from what is acceptable especially in sexual behavior” (same dictionary).

But my comments are always rejected by your blog. Why?

]]> By: DianeG http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8618 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:47:26 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8618 a lech is icky, sticky, and ulgy.
a perv is well, weird, not always ulgy though…

]]> By: Solonor http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8617 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:39:04 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8617 A lech makes me retch, but a perv makes me swerve?
I’m sorry. I got nothin’.

]]> By: nrc http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8616 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:12:35 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8616 One thought: Lech is gender-specific (m.). Perves can be m. or f. (I, a 23 yr old f., can still easily be a perv.)

Second thought: Lech also has older-man-looking-at-children connotations.

]]> By: peggy http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2418&cpage=1#comment-8615 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:34:32 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2418#comment-8615 I’m rubber, you’re glue. Whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you.

]]>