Comments on: Anti-Spam http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2160 We of course all understand it, being intellectuals. Thu, 05 Jun 2025 17:47:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0 By: Bob the Corgi http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2160&cpage=1#comment-7647 Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:29:48 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2160#comment-7647 that MeFi can suck the joy right out of just about anything, can’t it?

]]> By: miguel http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2160&cpage=1#comment-7646 Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:48:10 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2160#comment-7646 i was wondering whether they cared much about bounces and bad addresses – whether that would have any effect. i like the idea of everyone actually going to their sites and using up their bandwidth.

]]> By: ann http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2160&cpage=1#comment-7645 Wed, 28 Aug 2002 03:23:38 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2160#comment-7645 Nice idea, but after reading this, I’m doubtful about the idea.

http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/19469

]]> By: Bauke http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2160&cpage=1#comment-7644 Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:52:44 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2160#comment-7644 hmmm, you might get in trouble with the godzilla@toho.com…. :-)

oh and about spamproofing: This is my favorite:

bauke@UNDERPANTS.schildt.nl
(Remove UNDERPANTS to mail me… :-))

]]> By: Joeri http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=2160&cpage=1#comment-7643 Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:36:08 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=2160#comment-7643 You forgot: bugzilla@sextalk.at :)

]]>