Comments on: New Study Proves Men, Women Fundamentally Different! http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=1794 We of course all understand it, being intellectuals. Thu, 05 Jun 2025 17:47:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0 By: DIDOO hmar hadoudou http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=1794&cpage=1#comment-6241 Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:40:42 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=1794#comment-6241 Waoooo!
wanna see tne end!
Very very Good!

]]> By: jones http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=1794&cpage=1#comment-6240 Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:38:10 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=1794#comment-6240 good but u must develope a bit the study tests and the hypothesis !!

sheep jones

]]> By: Nadine http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=1794&cpage=1#comment-6239 Sat, 25 May 2002 16:45:46 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=1794#comment-6239 Dear Sir,
I am searching for the same type large sunglasses which Audrey Hepburn wore in “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” (1961 film).
The styles today, mostly small glasses, in my opinion are very unattractive.
Can you direct me as to where I can find
those beautiful type sunglasses?
My heartfelt thanks,
Nadia@catskill.net

]]> By: Mig http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=1794&cpage=1#comment-6238 Sat, 16 Feb 2002 12:02:21 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=1794#comment-6238 In fact, those aren’t even exactly the sunglasses she got, just the closest I could find at the Givenchy website. Hers are blue and slightly slimmer. Yes, and I understand the verification issue involved with not presenting the full text of the accompanying letter, but you have to realized, when all is said and done, this *is* a public forum; you must understand my reluctance to post private details here.

]]> By: Jessica http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=1794&cpage=1#comment-6237 Sat, 16 Feb 2002 02:22:35 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=1794#comment-6237 Ouch!

Those are some very sexy sunglasses.
But without the text of the letter, it is hard to qualify the data you present here.
Are those for you to wear, while gazing at her dazzling visage, or for her?

Am I overthinking this?

]]> By: Vex http://www.metamorphosism.com/?p=1794&cpage=1#comment-6236 Sat, 16 Feb 2002 02:13:17 +0000 http://vermeer.hmdnsgroup.com/~metamorp/?p=1794#comment-6236 Verry interesting!

]]>